Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1442MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100 +478%
10.34 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro GP100 +757%
240
Quadro M2000
28
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1304 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
715 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.0
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy