Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1627MHz vs 1560MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro GV100 +15%
16.66 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2018
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Volta
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1132 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
848 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
868.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
72
5120
Shading Units
4608
320
TMUs
288
128
ROPs
96
640
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

208.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
520.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
33.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
16.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
8.330 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
260W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
TU102
GV100-875-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Volta
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy