NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

VS

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages

Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages

Released 10 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock2050MHz

More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro K1000M

0.326 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Flex 170 +5050%

16.79 TFLOPS

Quadro K1000M

VS

Data Center GPU Flex 170

Graphics Card

Jun 2012

Release Date

Aug 2022

Quadro Mobile

Generation

Data Center GPU

Professional

Type

Professional

MXM-A (3.0)

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1950 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2050 MHz

900 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

16GB

DDR3

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

256bit

28.80GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

192

Shading Units

4096

16

TMUs

256

16

ROPs

128

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

32

16 KB (per SMX)

L1 Cache

-

256 KB

L2 Cache

16 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

262.4 GPixel/s

13.60 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

524.8 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

33.59 TFLOPS

326.4 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

16.79 TFLOPS

13.60 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Graphics Processor

GK107

GPU Name

DG2-512

N14P-Q1-A2

GPU Variant

ACM-G10

Kepler

Architecture

Generation 12.7

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

6 nm

1.27 billion

Transistors

21.7 billion

118 mm²

Die Size

406 mm²

Board Design

45W

TDP

150W

-

Suggested PSU

450 W

No outputs

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

-

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.1

Vulkan

1.3

3.0

CUDA

-

5.1

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

2

AMD Radeon HD 8690M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

3

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

4

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

5

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

6

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

7

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

8

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

9

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile

10

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI60

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance