Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +52%
1.151 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
576
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy