NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1785MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+217%
3.656 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K1200
949
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+239%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K1200
439
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+224%
1426
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU117
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
