Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1530MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +1261%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
512
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GV100
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy