Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro GV100 +2172%
16.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Volta
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1132 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
868.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
384
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.3 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
520.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.32 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.66 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.330 TFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GV100
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GV100-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy