Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 59W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +316%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
64
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G94
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
59W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy