Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M +91%
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy