Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro P4200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1647MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro P4200 Mobile +935%
7.589 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1227 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1647 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
18
384
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.4 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
118.6 GFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.589 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy