Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB +2558%
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
80GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1.94TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
384
Shading Units
6912
32
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
80 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA100
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy