CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+303%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
VS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU117B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
51W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
2
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
3
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
4
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
5
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
6
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
7
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
8
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M
9
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
10
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy