CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
+1654%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
VS
GRID RTX T10 4
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
384
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU102
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X
2
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
3
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
4
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
5
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
6
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
7
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
8
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
9
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
10
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy