Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB +2037%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1290 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GV100
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy