Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro K620 +17%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy