Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 78W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D +161%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
112
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

51W
TDP
78W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G92
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy