Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D +58%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy