Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M +121%
1.627 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1152
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy