Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D +124%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro K500M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy