Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +833%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM200
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy