Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q +536%
4.666 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
1920
32
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU106
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy