Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +2987%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
6656
32
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy