Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 570M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D +1101%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 570M
0.061 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.800 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.80 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G84
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
NB8P-GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy