Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Mobile +2309%
17.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
384
Shading Units
5888
32
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
276.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.66 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.66 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
276.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
140W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy