Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla M10

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla M10

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 8GB VRAM Tesla M10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M10 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla M10 +128%
1.672 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GM107-570-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy