NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
A10 PCIe
+5361%
31.24 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
30
A10 PCIe
+8250%
2505
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
384
Shading Units
9216
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA102
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
