Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +132%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF108
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy