Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 134W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +148%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
768MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
384
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
134W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G80
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy