Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +1200%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT218
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy