Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.13GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile +270%
2.122 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
35
Quadro M2200 Mobile +120%
77
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Quadro M2200 Mobile +250%
42
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
695 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM206
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy