Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
14208 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +21333%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
228
384
Shading Units
14592
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
MI300
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
146 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy