NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM Tesla T10 Processor to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Tesla T10 Processor
+8%
0.622 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Tesla T10 Processor
+1466%
188
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
188W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
