Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +111%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK107
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy