Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.13GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M +3239%
0.768 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
752 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
8
48
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
G98
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
12W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy