Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1785MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile +154%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy