Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 800W)
NVIDIA Tesla S1075 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M +37%
0.854 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy