Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M +78%
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
128
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G92
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy