Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Quadro P620 +84%
1.386 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.66 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.33 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.66 GFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1386 GFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.33 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP107
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy