Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25 +1532%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
576
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Vega 10
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy