CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25
+1532%
12.29 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
VS
Radeon Instinct MI25
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
576
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Vega 10
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
2
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
3
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1
4
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060
5
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA L4
6
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M
7
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
8
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
9
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
10
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Related News
1
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
2
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
3
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
4
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
5
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
6
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
7
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
8
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
9
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
10
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy