Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +626%
5.468 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
576
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.848 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
31.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
753.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
31.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA107S
N14E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy