NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+268%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
DG2-128
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
