Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile +388%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
768
Shading Units
1920
64
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU106
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy