NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro P2200
+252%
3.822 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
200.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
768
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.72 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.72 GFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.822 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
119.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GP106
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
