Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +661%
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA107S
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

75W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy