Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M +25%
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM107
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy