Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +1220%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
5888
64
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA104
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy