NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (18W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro T1200 Mobile
+169%
2.918 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.60 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
91.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.837 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.918 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
91.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
18W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU117
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
