Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
18496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +14059%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
304
960
Shading Units
19456
80
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
48.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
1154 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
48.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
MI300
N14E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy