Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
Quadro P600 +3%
1.196 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K4000M
97
Quadro P600 +25%
122
OctaneBench
Quadro K4000M
20
Quadro P600 +15%
23
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1329 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
-
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
48.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
1154 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
48.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP107
N14E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy