Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q +40%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
1536
96
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
67.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.627 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
67.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
N15E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy